Be sure not to use ImageLibrary because it is still as slow as it is. Photolab will even automatically create “External Selections” in Image Library that you always can use to reopen that same selection whenever you like. If you do, you will get those images opened with Photolab instantly in “Customize” if both applications are open simultaneously and Photolab is in Customize-mode. Use another application like Photo Mechanic or XnView or something else of your liking to select and “Open with” → Photolax.exe. How unique isn´t that today when cameras are taking 30 images+ in one second? Personally, I have over 70 000 images now in Photo Mechanic databases and I am a photographer never taking more than two shots of the same motif. So DXO ought to be able to use timestamps or other techniques to deactivate processing on the fly when walking through thumbnails without having to delete the whole database.Ģ5 000 images is nothing today. I hope that helps! Let me know if you have any other questions.ġ. TIMESTAMP values are recognized by MySQL in several formats and have a range from ‘ 00:00:01’ UTC to ‘ 03:14:07’ UTC 1 2. I asked Bing Copilot if MySQL is supporting “timestamps” and got this answer: Doesn´t MySQL Lite support that? When I used Lightroom I had problems that were more understandable since they were related to rescaling of previews when editing the images but as written the case here is not that but just walking through the thumbnail images of Image Library. … and Alec, of course we can start to deactivate a lot of functions to improve the speed but doing so we are bound to forget what we have deactivated over time creating a mess for ourselves in the long run, for example when reediting or exporting.Īdobe and Capture One seems to have addressed these problems in some way but DXO has not and I don´t accept deleting databases of reasons like this. BUT, how to explain that it´s the “Image Library” that is way slower than the “Customize”-module when walking through the images with the arrow-buttons or just selecting different images with the mouse. There has always been a price to pay with integrated image libraries and converters in integrated software but normally since the beginning of Lightroom that has mainly affected the scaling of the images to high resolution previews like in Photolab 6. I could accept syncing when things have changed both not if it hasn´t. One thing I have hard to understand is that it really seems to do quite a few things in the background despite nothing have changed with images and metadata and DOP-files. No real suggestions here, just something of which to be aware. Doing local adjustments last is not convenient as local adjustments seriously affect the artistic integrity of a set of corrections.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |